Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322780›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2024

MTX Osteopathy Versus Osteoporosis Including Response to Treatment Data-A Retrospective Single Center Study Including 172 Patients.

Felix N von Brackel, Jonathan Grambeck, Florian Barvencik, Michael Amling, Ralf Oheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Genotype-based comparison of bone microstructure in adult patients with classical osteogenesis imperfecta.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix N von Brackel *Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6586-6794
Jonathan Grambeck *Department of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian BarvencikDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael AmlingDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Ralf OheimDepartment of Osteology and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Lottestrasse 59, 22529, Hamburg, Germany. r.oheim@uke.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 499533307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MTX is an effective and widely used immunomodulatory drug for rheumatoid diseases. MTX osteopathy is a very rare and specific side effect, characterized by stress fractures at multiple locations in the lower extremity, hampering the patient's mobility by pain and loss of function. In clinical practice, osteoporosis and MTX osteopathy are repeatedly confused and a comparative workup is needed to clarity it's specifics. Furthermore, specific treatment options for MTX osteopathy need to be established. We compared patients suffering from MTX osteopathy to patients with osteoporosis (OPO). Patients underwent an extensive clinical workup including blood sampling, bone mineral density measurements, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography and muscular performance testing. Furthermore, treatment regimes in MTX osteopathy were compared with respect to regain of mobility and pain reduction. 83 patients with MTX osteopathy and 89 with OPO were included. Patients with MTX osteopathy did exhibit fractures predominantly at the lower extremity and pain scores were significantly higher (MTX: 6.75 ± 1.86 vs. OPO: 3.62 ± 2.95, p < 0.0001). MTX-caused mobility restriction was successfully reduced by treatment only if MTX was discontinued (pre-treatment: 2.16 ± 1.19 vs. post-treatment: 1.04 ± 0.87, p < 0.0001). Most mobility gain was achieved by involving anabolic treatment (anabolic: 2.1 ± 1.02 vs. antiresorptive: 1.09 ± 0.94, p < 0.05). In summary, MTX osteopathy is characterized by distinct lower extremity stress fractures leading to severe pain and immobility. Discontinuation of MTX is essential to enable treatment success and involving anabolic treatment seems to be more effectively in mobility regain as antiresorptive treatment alone.

Indexed as

MethotrexateOsteoporosisAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexateHR-pQCTMTXMTX osteopathyOsteoporosisStress fractureTherapy

Identifiers

PMID39322780
PMCPMC11531443

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.