Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322997›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025

Membrane trafficking of synaptic adhesion molecules.

Cristian A Bogaciu, Silvio O Rizzoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristian A BogaciuInstitute for Neuro- and Sensory Physiology and Biostructural Imaging of Neurodegeneration (BIN) Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-7781-7040
Silvio O RizzoliInstitute for Neuro- and Sensory Physiology and Biostructural Imaging of Neurodegeneration (BIN) Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1667-7839

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SFB1286/A3/B2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapse formation and stabilization are aided by several families of adhesion molecules, which are generally seen as specialized surface receptors. The function of most surface receptors, including adhesion molecules, is modulated in non-neuronal cells by the processes of endocytosis and recycling, which control the number of active receptors found on the cell surface. These processes have not been investigated extensively at the synapse. This review focuses on the current status of this topic, summarizing general findings on the membrane trafficking of the most prominent synaptic adhesion molecules. Remarkably, evidence for endocytosis processes has been obtained for many synaptic adhesion proteins, including dystroglycans, latrophilins, calsyntenins, netrins, teneurins, neurexins, neuroligins and neuronal pentraxins. Less evidence has been obtained on their recycling, possibly because of the lack of specific assays. We conclude that the trafficking of the synaptic adhesion molecules is an important topic, which should receive more attention in the future.

Indexed as

Cell Adhesion MoleculesCell MembraneSynapsesAnimalsCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalEndocytosisHumansProtein TransportCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronaladhesion moleculesdystroglycannetrin receptorneurexinneuroliginsynapse

Identifiers

PMID39322997
PMCPMC12559978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.