Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323856›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Development of cost-effective inorganic arsenic extraction method for resource-limited regions: Analysis of efficiency and regulatory implications.

Angstone Thembachako Mlangeni, Elizabeth Mhone, Alexander Ndhlovu Chibwana, Collings Chapachapa, Fatema Jagot, Lot Botha, Sydney Namaumbo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angstone Thembachako MlangeniFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Elizabeth MhoneFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Alexander Ndhlovu ChibwanaFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Collings ChapachapaFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Fatema JagotFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lot BothaFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sydney NamaumboFaculty of Life Sciences and Natural Sciences, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of coke and lemonade extraction methods compared to the standard 1 % v/v HNO

Indexed as

Arsenic contaminationCokeComparative analysisExtractionField-deployable methodsFood safetyInorganic arsenicLemonadeNitric acidPublic healthRice bran

Identifiers

PMID39323856
PMCPMC11422023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.