Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323921›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2024

Day-case artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: A comparative pilot study.

Konstantinos Kapriniotis, Ioannis Loufopoulos, Richard Nobrega, Anthony Noah, Helena Gresty, Tamsin Greenwell, Jeremy Ockrim

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos KapriniotisDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.
Ioannis LoufopoulosDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.
Richard NobregaDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.
Anthony NoahDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1488-6581
Helena GrestyDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.
Tamsin GreenwellDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-7604
Jeremy OckrimDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospital UCLH@ Westmoreland Street London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-9826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) to treat post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) has been traditionally offered with an overnight hospital stay. The aim of this prospective, comparative pilot study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of the AUS procedure in a day-case setting. Patients and methods: We included consecutive patients having primary or redo AUS surgery over an 18-month period. We excluded patients with previous urethral erosion of AUS, urethroplasty or high anaesthetic risk. All patients were offered day-case surgery. Patients who declined or could not have day-case surgery for logistical reasons had standard care with overnight stay and formed the control group for the study. Primary outcome was the proportion of successful same day-discharges in the day-case group. We also compared baseline characteristics, complications and continence at 1 year post surgery. Results: Twelve patients consented for day-case procedure, and 13 patients had standard overnight care. Mean age was 69.5 years (range 58-79). Twenty-one patients (84%) had primary AUS, whereas 4 (16%) had a redo procedure. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline demographics. Median number of pads/24 h was 5 in the day-case group and 4 in the overnight group. Eight of 12 patients (66.7%) in the day-case group were successfully discharged on the same day. Failed discharges were due to anaesthetic recovery ( Conclusion: Day-case catheter-free discharge of AUS patients is feasible and safe in selected patients with comparable continence outcomes and complication rates to those with standard overnight stays.

Indexed as

artificial urinary sphincterday‐caseoutpatient surgerypost‐prostatectomy incontinence

Identifiers

PMID39323921
PMCPMC11420099

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.