Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39325034›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Hippocampal-occipital connectivity reflects autobiographical memory deficits in aphantasia.

Merlin Monzel, Pitshaporn Leelaarporn, Teresa Lutz, Johannes Schultz, Sascha Brunheim, Martin Reuter, Cornelia McCormick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unfolding Nostalgia: Spatial Visualization, Nostalgia, and Well-Being.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Neural Underpinnings of Aphantasia: A Case Study of Identical Twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Merlin Monzel *Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-9350
Pitshaporn Leelaarporn *German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-875X
Teresa LutzGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes SchultzCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Sascha BrunheimGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9341-797X
Martin ReuterDepartment of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Cornelia McCormickGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MC244/3-1Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen BN059K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphantasia refers to reduced or absent visual imagery. While most of us can readily recall decade-old personal experiences (autobiographical memories, AM) with vivid mental images, there is a dearth of information about whether the loss of visual imagery in aphantasics affects their AM retrieval. The hippocampus is thought to be a crucial hub in a brain-wide network underlying AM. One important question is whether this network, especially the connectivity of the hippocampus, is altered in aphantasia. In the current study, we tested 14 congenital aphantasics and 16 demographically matched controls in an AM fMRI task to investigate how key brain regions (i.e. hippocampus and visual-perceptual cortices) interact with each other during AM re-experiencing. All participants were interviewed regarding their autobiographical memory to examine their episodic and semantic recall of specific events. Aphantasics reported more difficulties in recalling AM, were less confident about their memories, and described less internal and emotional details than controls. Neurally, aphantasics displayed decreased hippocampal and increased visual-perceptual cortex activation during AM retrieval compared to controls. In addition, controls showed strong negative functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the visual cortex during AM and resting-state functional connectivity between these two brain structures predicted better visualization skills. Our results indicate that visual mental imagery plays an important role in detail-rich vivid AM, and that this type of cognitive function is supported by the functional connection between the hippocampus and the visual-perceptual cortex.

Indexed as

HippocampusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, EpisodicAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMental RecallMiddle AgedOccipital LobeYoung Adultaphantasiaautobiographical retrievalepisodic memoryfunctional connectivityhumanneural networksneurosciencevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID39325034
PMCPMC11426968

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.