ArticleScientific reports2024
Sex differences in survival outcomes of early-onset colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Patterns ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Survival improvement and widening social disadvantage-related disparities in osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Primary Tumor-Associated Loss of the Y Chromosome and Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2026Article
- Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Sweden and Finland: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study Over Three Decades.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Gender disparities in the overall survival of patients with minimally invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
- Sex-Associated Aspects of Referral, Resectability, and Survival in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM): A Population-Based Single-Center Study of 1207 MDT-Referred Patients.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Sex and gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening: a consensus study from the AIOM- GISEG working group.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Treatment Delays and Survival Divides: Race, Sex, and Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Disparities.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Survival implications of the age-associated tumor and normal adjacent tissue microbiome among colorectal cancer patients.Gut pathogens · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer in the U.S., 1999-2021: Declining Rates, Rising Concerns, and Persistent Disparities.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- RDW-CV and Male Sex as Possible Response Factors to 9-Month Colorectal Cancer Palliative Chemotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Survival Disparities in Adenocarcinoma Within Adenomatous Polyps: A National Cancer Database Analysis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Sex and age-related differences in one-, three-, and five-year survival for early-onset colorectal cancer in Georgia.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most fatal cancers in the United States. Although the overall incidence and mortality rates are declining, an alarming rise in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as CRC diagnosis in patients aged < 50 years, was previously reported. Our study focuses on analyzing sex-specific differences in survival among EOCRC patients and comparing sex-specific predictors of survival in both males and females in the United States. We retrieved and utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. EOCRC patients, between the ages of 20 and 49, were exclusively included. We conducted thorough survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, Cox regression models, and propensity score matching to control for potential biases. Our study included 58,667 EOCRC patients (27,662 females, 31,005 males) diagnosed between 2000 and 2017. The baseline characteristics at the time of diagnosis were significantly heterogeneous between males and females. Males exhibited significantly worse overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and noncancer-specific survival (NCSS) in comparison to females in both the general cohort, and the matched cohort. Predictors of survival outcomes generally followed a similar pattern in both sexes except for minor differences. In conclusion, we identified sex as an independent prognostic factor of EOCRC, suggesting disparities in survival between sexes. Further understanding of the epidemiological and genetic bases of these differences could facilitate targeted, personalized therapeutic approaches for EOCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.