ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2024
Hepatic steatosis: Qualitative and quantitative sonographic assessment in comparison to histology.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategy to Improve Diagnostic Performance of Hepatic Steatosis Grading Using Ultrasound: Combination of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease and Kidney Transplant Outcomes.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Accurate and spatially stable quantification of hepatic steatosis using ultrasound-derived fat fraction in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a prospective magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- The ALT/AST Ratio as a Predictor of MASLD in Obese Children: A Comparative Analysis with Metabolic Indices Including HOMA-IR and TyG.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A TyG-UHR-based machine learning model for screening lean MAFLD: development and external validation.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Metabolic Syndrome and Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Fibromyalgia.Archives of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Qualitative assessment of hepatic steatosis on modern grayscale ultrasound: more accurate than previously thought?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Depth-Dependent Variability in Ultrasound Attenuation Imaging for Hepatic Steatosis: A Pilot Study of ATI and HRI in Healthy Volunteers.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management - Let's practice the evidence.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Globally, B-mode ultrasound is the most common modality used for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis. We aimed to assess the correlation between qualitative liver ultrasound parameters, attenuation imaging (ATI) and histopathology-diagnosed steatosis grade obtained from liver biopsy. Our secondary aim was to examine the interobserver variability of qualitative ultrasound features. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed which included adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who had same-day liver ultrasound, ATI and liver biopsy for grading hepatic steatosis severity between 2018 and 2022. The qualitative US features for hepatic steatosis were independently scored by three radiologists and interobserver variability was examined. Histologic steatosis grade, ATI and qualitative ultrasound parameters were compared. Results: Ninety patients were included; 67% female with a median age of 54 (IQR 39-65) years. The radiologist's overall impression had the highest correlation (very strongly correlated) with histologic steatosis grade (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). ATI coefficient and all qualitative ultrasound B-mode features except for liver echotexture and focal fat sparing were strongly correlated with histologic steatosis grade (r ≥ 0.70, P < 0.001). Most qualitative ultrasound features had good agreement between observers (Kappa statistic 0.61-1.0, P < 0.001), (Kendall coefficient 0.92, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The examined qualitative ultrasound parameters and ATI had good-excellent performance for diagnosing clinically significant hepatic steatosis; however, the radiologist's overall impression had the best correlation with histologic steatosis grade. Our findings suggest an ongoing role for qualitative liver ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis despite the emergence of newer quantitative measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.