Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39329979›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Using NGS to Uncover the Corruption of a Peptide Phage Display Selection.

Danna Kamstrup Sell, Babak Bakhshinejad, Anders Wilgaard Sinkjaer, Ida Melissa Dawoodi, Mette Neiegaard Wiinholt, Ane Beth Sloth, Camilla Stavnsbjerg, Andreas Kjaer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phage Display as a Promising Platform for Peptide Drug Discovery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danna Kamstrup SellDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1773-5172
Babak BakhshinejadDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-6688
Anders Wilgaard SinkjaerDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-481X
Ida Melissa DawoodiDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0005-9908-2919
Mette Neiegaard WiinholtDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0003-1061-222X
Ane Beth SlothDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-9812
Camilla StavnsbjergDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas KjaerDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-5547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage display has been widely used to identify peptides binding to a variety of biological targets. In the current work, we planned to select novel peptides targeting CD4 through screening of a commercial phage display library (New England Biolabs Ph.D.

Indexed as

biopanningcombinatorial diversitycorruptionfast-propagating cloneNGSpeptide libraryphage displaysanger sequencingsequence spaceTUP

Identifiers

PMID39329979
PMCPMC11431649

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.