Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39330071›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Information-Geometric Formulation of Pattern Separation and Evaluation of Existing Indices.

Harvey Wang, Selena Singh, Thomas Trappenberg, Abraham Nunes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Entropy of Neuronal Spike Patterns.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harvey WangFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Selena SinghDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Thomas TrappenbergFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6144-8963
Abraham NunesFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4955-9150

Funding

Research Nova Scotia RNS-NHIG-2021-1931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pattern separation is a computational process by which dissimilar neural patterns are generated from similar input patterns. We present an information-geometric formulation of pattern separation, where a pattern separator is modeled as a family of statistical distributions on a manifold. Such a manifold maps an input (i.e., coordinates) to a probability distribution that generates firing patterns. Pattern separation occurs when small coordinate changes result in large distances between samples from the corresponding distributions. Under this formulation, we implement a two-neuron system whose probability law forms a three-dimensional manifold with mutually orthogonal coordinates representing the neurons' marginal and correlational firing rates. We use this highly controlled system to examine the behavior of spike train similarity indices commonly used in pattern separation research. We find that all indices (except scaling factor) are sensitive to relative differences in marginal firing rates, but no index adequately captures differences in spike trains that result from altering the correlation in activity between the two neurons. That is, existing pattern separation metrics appear (A) sensitive to patterns that are encoded by different neurons but (B) insensitive to patterns that differ only in relative spike timing (e.g., synchrony between neurons in the ensemble).

Indexed as

information geometryinformation theorypattern separation

Identifiers

PMID39330071
PMCPMC11431106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.