ArticleScientific data2024
Comparison of basal ganglia regions across murine brain atlases using metadata models and the Waxholm Space.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Tapping-Mode Scanning Probe Electrospray Ionization Platform for High-Sensitivity and Long-Term Stability in Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Tissue.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A novel gene edited rat model of cerebral autosomal recessive arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CARASIL).Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Article
- Comparison of basal ganglia regions across murine brain atlases using metadata models and the Waxholm Space.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The murine basal ganglia regions are targets for research into complex brain functions such as motor control and habit formation. However, there are several ways to name and annotate these regions, posing challenges for interpretation and comparison of data across studies. Here, we give an overview of basal ganglia terms and boundaries in the literature and reference atlases, and describe the criteria used for annotating these regions in the Waxholm Space rat brain atlas. We go on to compare basal ganglia annotations in stereotaxic rat brain atlases and the Allen Mouse brain Common Coordinate Framework to those in the Waxholm Space rat brain atlas. We demonstrate and describe considerable differences in the terms and boundaries of most basal ganglia regions across atlases and their versions. We also register information about atlases and regions in the openMINDS metadata framework, facilitating integration of data in neuroscience databases. The comparisons of terms and boundaries across rat and mouse atlases support analysis and interpretation of existing and new data from the basal ganglia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.