ArticleScientific reports2024
Transcriptome-guided selection of stable reference genes for expression analysis in spinach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of gene expression levels is vital for advancing plant biology research. This study explores the identification and validation of stable reference genes (RGs) for gene expression analysis in Spinacia oleracea. Leveraging transcriptome data from various developmental stages, we employed rigorous statistical analyses to identify potential RGs. A total of 1196 candidate genes were initially screened based on expression variability, with subsequent refinement using criteria such as low variance and stability. Among 12 commonly used candidate RGs, EF1α and H3 emerged as the most stable across diverse experimental conditions, while GRP and PPR exhibited lower stability. These findings were further validated through qRT-PCR assays and comprehensive statistical analyses, including geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RefFinder. Our study underscores the importance of systematic RG selection to ensure accurate normalization in gene expression studies, particularly in the context of S. oleracea developmental stages and physiological processes like flowering. These validated RGs provide a robust foundation for future gene expression analysis in S. oleracea and contribute to the advancement of molecular research in plant biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.