ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of host microRNAs on the development of conserved mutations of SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA-driven evolutionary pressure in SARS-CoV-2: the role of hsa-miR-6512 in mutational dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Micro-Epigenetic Markers in Viral Genome: SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impact on Host Cell MicroRNA Landscape.Maedica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, has undergone various genetic alterations due to evolutionary pressures exerted by host cells, including intracellular antiviral mechanisms such as targeting by human microRNAs (miRNAs). This study investigates the impact of miRNAs hsa-miR-3132 and hsa-miR-4650 on the viral genome. Sequence alignment revealed conserved mutations in the binding sites of these miRNAs in adapted strains compared to the original Wuhan-Hu-1 strain, leading to their deletion. Despite modest expression of these miRNAs in SARS-CoV-2 target tissues, their efficacy against mutant strains is reduced due to the loss of binding sites. Structural analysis indicates that the mutant genome is more stable than the Wuhan-Hu-1 genome. Luciferase and virus titration assays demonstrate that hsa-miR-3132 and hsa-miR-4650 effectively target the Nsp3 gene in the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain but not in mutant strains lacking their binding sites. These findings suggest that the observed mutations help the virus evade selective pressure from human miRNAs, contributing to its adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.