ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction models for cognitive impairment in middle-aged patients with cerebral small vessel disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAim to validate the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models for predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD).
methodsParticipants were divided into mild cognitive impairment group (mild-CSVD group) and sever cognitive impairment group (sever-CSVD group) according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance, 98 gender-age-education matched subjects served as normal controls. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented hippocampus using PyRadiomics. The feature preprocessing involved replacing missing values with the mean, applying stratified random sampling to allocate subjects into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, ensuring balance among the three classes (normal controls, mild-CSVD group, and sever-CSVD group). A feature selection method was applied to identify discriminative radiomic features, with the optimal texture feature chosen for developing diagnostic models. Performance was evaluated in both the training and testing sets using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
resultsThe radiomics model achieved an accuracy of 0.625, an AUC of 0.593, a sensitivity of 0.828, and a specificity of 0.316 in distinguishing mild-CSVD group from normal controls. When distinguishing mild-CSVD group from sever-CSVD group, the radiomics model reached an accuracy of 0.683, an AUC of 0.660, a sensitivity of 0.167, and a specificity of 0.897. Similarly, in distinguishing sever-CSVD group from normal controls, the radiomics model exhibited an accuracy of 0.781, an AUC of 0.818, a sensitivity of 0.538, and a specificity of 0.947.
conclusionRadiomics model based on hippocampal texture had disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with CSVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.