Evidence mapPaperPMID 39334117Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2024

Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment adapted to primary care when provided by a nurse or a general practitioner: the CEpiA cluster-randomised trial.

Veronique Orcel, Leon Banh, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Vincent Renard, Emmanuelle Boutin, Amel Gouja, Philippe Caillet, Elena Paillaud, Etienne Audureau, Emilie Ferrat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664454 (Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664454 nacompletednot on this map

Compared Efficacy of Nurse-led and GP-led Geriatric Assessment in PrImary Care: A Pragmatic Three-arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2018Enrolled750ConditionsMultimorbidity, Geriatric AssessmentArmshealth care organization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Veronique OrcelDepartment of General Practice, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Health Faculty, 8 Rue du Général Sarrail, Creteil, 94010, France.
Leon BanhDepartment of General Practice, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Health Faculty, 8 Rue du Général Sarrail, Creteil, 94010, France.
Sylvie Bastuji-GarinIMRB (CEpiA Group), Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM U955, Creteil, 94010, France.
Vincent RenardDepartment of General Practice, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Health Faculty, 8 Rue du Général Sarrail, Creteil, 94010, France.
Emmanuelle BoutinIMRB (CEpiA Group), Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM U955, Creteil, 94010, France.
Amel GoujaUnité de Recherche Clinique (URC), Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, 94000, France.
Philippe CailletIMRB (CEpiA Group), Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM U955, Creteil, 94010, France.
Elena PaillaudIMRB (CEpiA Group), Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM U955, Creteil, 94010, France.
Etienne AudureauIMRB (CEpiA Group), Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM U955, Creteil, 94010, France.
Emilie FerratDepartment of General Practice, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Health Faculty, 8 Rue du Général Sarrail, Creteil, 94010, France. emilie.ferrat@u-pec.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) are well established for hospital care but less so for primary care. Our primary objective was to assess the effect of two multifaceted interventions based on a CGA adapted for primary care on a composite criterion combining all-cause mortality, emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions, and institutionalisation.

methodsThis open-label, pragmatic, three-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial involved 39 general practices in France. It included 634 patients aged 70 years or over with chronic health conditions and/or an unplanned hospital admission in the past 3 months, between 05/2016 and 08/2018. Interventions were in arm 1: a systematic nurse-led CGA; arm 2: a GP-led CGA, at the GP's discretion; arm 3: standard care. The primary composite endpoint was assessed at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included: components of the composite endpoint, health-related quality of life (Duke Health Profile), functional status (Katz Activities of Daily Living Index) and medications (number) at 12 months. Pairwise comparisons between the experimental groups and the control were tested. The main analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, after imputing missing information and adjusting for baseline imbalances by mixed effects regressions.

resultsFor the primary composite outcome, no statistically significant difference was found between arm 1 and the control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.81 [95%CI 0.54-1.21], P = 0.31), whereas arm 2 and the control differed significantly (aOR = 0.60 [0.39-0.93], P = 0.022). A statistically lower risk of unplanned hospital admission in arm 2 vs control (aOR = 0.57 [0.36-0.92], P = 0.020)) was observed, while no statistically significant differences were found for the other components and between arm 1 and the control. None of the other secondary endpoints differed between arms.

conclusionsOur study led in community-dwelling older patients with chronic conditions found no significant effect of a CGA adapted for primary care on mortality, functional independence and quality of life, but suggests that a GP-led CGA may reduce the risk of unplanned hospital admission. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating CGA into clinical practice and highlights its potential benefits when applied on a case-by-case basis, guided by the GPs who develop the resulting PCP.

trial registrationNCT02664454.

Indexed as

General PractitionersGeriatric AssessmentPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansMaleNursesQuality of LifeGeneral practiceGeriatric assessmentHealthy agingPhysician-nurse relationsPrimary careRandomized controlled trials as topic

Identifiers

PMID39334117
PMCPMC11437618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.