ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2024
Safety assessment of Tafamidis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) events.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of ocular adverse events associated with SNRIs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A Pharmacovigilance Study from 2004 to 2024 Utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Examines Ischemic Adverse Events Linked to Triptan Use in Migraine Therapy.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of adverse events associated with irbesartan using the FAERS and JADER databases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Drug-induced hearing disorders: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTafamidis-associated adverse events (AEs) were investigated retrospectively by data mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to inform clinical safety.
methodsData were gathered from the FAERS database, which spans the second quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023. A total number of 8532 reports of Tafamidis-related adverse events were detected after evaluating 8,432,351 data. Disproportionality analyses were used to quantify the signal and assess the significance of Tafamidis-associated AEs using four algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN).
resultsAmong the 8532 reports of AEs with Tafamidis as the primary suspected drug, Tafamidis-induced AEs were identified as occurring in 27 system organ classes (SOC). A total of 207 Tafamidis-induced AEs were detected which simultaneously complied with the four algorithms. Our analysis also identified new adverse reactions including Hypoacusis, Deafness, and Essential hypertension. The median onset of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis was 180 days (interquartile range [IQR] 51-419 days).
conclusionTafamidis is a drug that has shown favorable safety and tolerability results in clinical trials. However, a number of adverse reactions associated with Tafamidis have been identified through analysis of the FAERS database. In clinical applications, it is recommended to closely monitor patients' hearing while using Tafamidis. In addition, it is hoped that further experimental and clinical studies will be conducted in the future to understand the mechanism of occurrence between Tafamidis and adverse reactions such as primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and height reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.