ArticleBMC health services research2024
Economic burden of patients with leading cancers in China: a cost-of-illness study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and determinants of financial toxicity in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2026Pooled it
- Coordinated psycho-oncology in young adults with breast cancer: equity gradients, timely access, and out-of-pocket spending in China.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Green Nanodrugs: Research Progress and Challenges of Plant-Derived Nanovesicles in Tumor Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of fuzuloparib, with or without apatinib, for BRCA mutation HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of two major population-based breast cancer screening programmes in China: a model-based economic evaluation.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- The global cancer crisis: a review of growing burden, deepening inequality and initiatives for prevention and early detection.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Review
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on the Survival of Stage IV NSCLC Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Understanding and mitigating cancer-related financial toxicity in China: challenges and recommendations.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Study Employing Computational Analysis and Mendelian Randomization Has Revealed the Impact of Key Genes on Liver Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The economic ramifications of liver cancer on a global, regional, and national scale.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChina accounts for 24% of newly diagnosed cancer cases and 30% of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Comprehensive analyses of the economic burden on patients across different cancer treatment phases, based on empirical data, are lacking. This study aims to estimate the financial burden borne by patients and analyze the cost compositions of the leading cancers with the highest number of new cases in China.
methodsThis cross-sectional cost-of-illness study analyzed patients diagnosed with lung, breast, colorectal, esophageal, liver, or gastric cancer, identified through electronic health records (EHRs) from 84 hospitals across 17 provinces in China. Patients completed any one of the initial treatment phase, follow-up phase, and relapse/metastasis phase were recruited by trained attending physicians through a stratified sampling procedure to ensure enough cases for each cancer progression stage and cancer treatment phase. Direct and indirect costs by treatment phase were collected from the EHRs and self-reported surveys. We estimated per case cost for each type of cancer, and employed subgroup analyses and multiple linear regression models to explore cost drivers.
resultsWe recruited a total of 13,745 cancer patients across three treatment phases. The relapse/metastasis phase incurred the highest per case costs, varying from $8,890 to $14,572, while the follow-up phase was the least costly, ranging from $1,840 to $4,431. Being in the relapse/metastasis phase and having an advanced clinical stage of cancer at diagnosis were associated with significantly higher cost, while patients with low socioeconomic status borne lower costs.
conclusionsThere were substantial financial burden on patients with six leading cancers in China. Health policymakers should emphasize comprehensive healthcare coverage for marginalized populations such as the uninsured, less educated, and those living in underdeveloped regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.