Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335312›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Breeding Value Prediction in Horses: An Example Using Gait Visual Scores.

Fernando Bussiman, Anderson A C Alves, Jennifer Richter, Jorge Hidalgo, Renata Veroneze, Tiago Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernando BussimanAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-5816
Anderson A C AlvesAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jennifer RichterAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jorge HidalgoAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-381X
Renata VeronezeAnimal and Dairy Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Tiago OliveiraStatistics Department, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande 58429-500, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-7721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait scores are widely used in the genetic evaluation of horses. However, the nature of such measurement may limit genetic progress since there is subjectivity in phenotypic information. This study aimed to assess the application of machine learning techniques in the prediction of breeding values for five visual gait scores in Campolina horses: dissociation, comfort, style, regularity, and development. The dataset contained over 5000 phenotypic records with 107,951 horses (14 generations) in the pedigree. A fixed model was used to estimate least-square solutions for fixed effects and adjusted phenotypes. Variance components and breeding values (EBV) were obtained via a multiple-trait model (MTM). Adjusted phenotypes and fixed effects solutions were used to train machine learning models (using the EBV from MTM as target variable): artificial neural network (ANN), random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR). To validate the models, the linear regression method was used. Accuracy was comparable across all models (but it was slightly higher for ANN). The highest bias was observed for ANN, followed by MTM. Dispersion varied according to the trait; it was higher for ANN and the lowest for MTM. Machine learning is a feasible alternative to EBV prediction; however, this method will be slightly biased and over-dispersed for young animals.

Indexed as

gait predictionmachine learningsupport vector regressionvisual scores

Identifiers

PMID39335312
PMCPMC11429212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.