ReviewBiomedicines2024
The Monocrotaline Rat Model of Right Heart Disease Induced by Pulmonary Artery Hypertension.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle histological remodeling precedes functional impairment in a muscle-specific manner following monocrotaline-induced heart failure in rats.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Zinc-Induced PKCδ-dependent Phosphorylation of MTF-1 Promotes Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling in Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Molecular Hydrogen in Different Heart Failure Models: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Functional, histological, and molecular adaptations of forelimb muscles in a rat model of monocrotaline-induced heart failure.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2025Article
- Initial Body Weight as an Important Factor for Improving the Reliability and Translational Relevance of the Preclinical Monocrotaline-Induced Rat Pulmonary Hypertension Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Consequences of Right Heart Disease for Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias: Cellular and Structural Mechanisms.CJC open · 2025Review
- Is the SPLUNC1-Orai1 axis a critical determinant of lung health?Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Experimental animal models and patient-derived platforms to bridge preclinical discovery and translational therapeutics in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) is characterised by increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) resulting in elevated pressure in the pulmonary artery supplying the pulmonary circulation. Disease of the right ventricle (RV) often manifests as a result of PAH placing excessive pressure on the right side of the heart. Although a relatively rare disease in humans, the impact of sustained PAH is severe, with poor outcomes even in treated individuals. As PAH develops, the blood flow is restricted through the pulmonary arteries and the right ventricle hypertrophies due to the increased strain of pumping blood through the pulmonary circulation. With time, RV hypertrophy progresses to right heart failure, impacting the supply of blood to the left ventricle and systemic circulation. Although right heart failure can currently be treated, it cannot be cured. There is therefore a need for more research into the physiological changes that cause the heart to fail under pressure overload. This review aims to evaluate the monocrotaline (MCT) rat model of PAH as a means of studying the cellular mechanisms associated with the development of RV hypertrophy and right heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.