Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335650›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Circulating Tumor Cells: Origin, Role, Current Applications, and Future Perspectives for Personalized Medicine.

Maria Cristina Rapanotti, Tonia Cenci, Maria Giovanna Scioli, Elisa Cugini, Silvia Anzillotti, Luca Savino, Deborah Coletta, Cosimo Di Raimondo, Elena Campione, Mario Roselli and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maria Cristina RapanottiAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Tonia CenciAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Maria Giovanna ScioliAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8458-4108
Elisa CuginiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Silvia AnzillottiAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-0764-0495
Luca SavinoAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-2225
Deborah ColettaOncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Cosimo Di RaimondoDermatology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-9381
Elena CampioneDermatology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-6798
Mario RoselliOncology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2431-6689
Sergio BernardiniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Luca BianchiDermatology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-6896
Anastasia De LucaDepartment of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6532-989X
Amedeo FerlosioAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Augusto OrlandiAnatomic Pathology, Department of Integrated Care Processes, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7202-5854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) currently represent a revolutionary tool offering unique insights for the evaluation of cancer progression, metastasis, and response to therapies. Indeed, CTCs, upon detachment from primary tumors, enter the bloodstream and acquire a great potential for their use for personalized cancer management. In this review, we describe the current understanding of and advances in the clinical employment of CTCs. Although considered rare and fleeting, CTCs are now recognized as key players favoring the development of cancer metastasis and disease recurrence, particularly in malignant melanoma, lung, breast, and colorectal cancer patients. To date, the advancements in technology and the development of several successful approaches, also including immunomagnetic enrichment allow for a reliable and reproducible detection and characterization of CTCs. Those innovative methodologies improved the isolation, quantification, and characterization of CTCs from the blood of cancer patients, providing extremely useful evidence and new insights into the nature of the tumor, its epithelial/mesenchymal profile, and its potential resistance to therapy. In fact, in addition to their prognostic and predictive value, CTCs could serve as a valuable instrument for real-time monitoring of treatment response and disease recurrence, facilitating timely interventions and thus improving patient outcomes. However, despite their potential, several challenges hinder the widespread clinical utility of CTCs: (i) CTCs' rarity and heterogeneity pose technical limitations in isolation and characterization, as well as significant hurdles in their clinical implementation; (ii) it is mandatory to standardize CTC detection methods, optimize the sample processing techniques, and integrate them with existing diagnostic modalities; and (iii) the need for the development of new techniques, such as single-cell analysis platforms, to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of CTC detection, thereby facilitating their integration into routine clinical practice. In conclusion, CTCs represent a potential extraordinary tool in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, offering unprecedented opportunities for personalized medicine and precision oncology. Moreover, their ability to provide

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellsCTC prognostic and predictive valueliquid biopsymetastasis

Identifiers

PMID39335650
PMCPMC11429165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.