ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Enhancing Predictive Accuracy for Recurrence-Free Survival in Head and Neck Tumor: A Comparative Study of Weighted Fusion Radiomic Analysis.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-to-PET Synthesis in the Head-Neck and Thoracic Region via Conditional 3D Latent Diffusion Modeling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal Late-Fusion of Radiomics, Clinical Data, and Demographics Enhances Personalized Survival Prediction in NSCLC.Cancers · 2026Article
- 3D Latent Diffusion Model for MR-Only Radiotherapy: Accurate and Consistent Synthetic CT Generation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advancements in oncology, predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) in head and neck (H&N) cancer remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of tumor biology and treatment responses. This study aims to address the research gap in the prognostic efficacy of traditional clinical predictors versus advanced radiomics features and to explore the potential of weighted fusion techniques for enhancing RFS prediction. We utilized clinical data, radiomic features from CT and PET scans, and various weighted fusion algorithms to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for RFS. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the significance of differences in RFS rates was assessed using confidence interval (CI) tests. The weighted fusion model with a 90% emphasis on PET features significantly outperformed individual modalities, yielding the highest C-index. Additionally, the incorporation of contextual information by varying peritumoral radii did not substantially improve prediction accuracy. While the clinical model and the radiomics model, individually, did not achieve statistical significance in survival differentiation, the combined feature set showed improved performance. The integration of radiomic features with clinical data through weighted fusion algorithms enhances the predictive accuracy of RFS outcomes in head and neck cancer. Our findings suggest that the utilization of multi-modal data helps in developing more reliable predictive models and underscore the potential of PET imaging in refining prognostic assessments. This study propels the discussion forward, indicating a pivotal step toward the adoption of precision medicine in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.