Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336744›Full record

ReviewGenes2024

Mitochondrial Dysfunctions: Genetic and Cellular Implications Revealed by Various Model Organisms.

Monika Stańczyk, Natalia Szubart, Roman Maslanka, Renata Zadrag-Tecza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika StańczykInstitute of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Natalia SzubartInstitute of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Roman MaslankaInstitute of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-4222
Renata Zadrag-TeczaInstitute of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5073-9274

Funding

Minister of Science of the Republic of Poland Programme "Regional initiative of excellence". Agreement No. RID/SP/0010/2024/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria play a crucial role in maintaining the energy status and redox homeostasis of eukaryotic cells. They are responsible for the metabolic efficiency of cells, providing both ATP and intermediate metabolic products. They also regulate cell survival and death under stress conditions by controlling the cell response or activating the apoptosis process. This functional diversity of mitochondria indicates their great importance for cellular metabolism. Hence, dysfunctions of these structures are increasingly recognized as an element of the etiology of many human diseases and, therefore, an extremely promising therapeutic target. Mitochondrial dysfunctions can be caused by mutations in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, as well as by stress factors or replication errors. Progress in knowledge about the biology of mitochondria, as well as the consequences for the efficiency of the entire organism resulting from the dysfunction of these structures, is achieved through the use of model organisms. They are an invaluable tool for analyzing complex cellular processes, leading to a better understanding of diseases caused by mitochondrial dysfunction. In this work, we review the most commonly used model organisms, discussing both their advantages and limitations in modeling fundamental mitochondrial processes or mitochondrial diseases.

Indexed as

MitochondriaMitochondrial DiseasesAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialHumansDNA, Mitochondrialmitochondriamitochondrial dysfunctionmodel organisms

Identifiers

PMID39336744
PMCPMC11431519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.