ArticleGenes2024
Substrate-Mediated Regulation of Src Expression Drives Osteoclastogenesis Divergence.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paradoxical combination of osteosclerosis and osteopenia in an adult woman with biallelicJBMR plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGlass, bone, and dentin are commonly applied substrates for osteoclast cultures; however, the impact of these substrates on osteoclastogenesis remains underexplored. This study aimed to address a significant gap in understanding how different substrates influence the process of osteoclastogenesis.
methodsRAW 264.7 cells were cultured and induced with RANKL on glass, bone, and dentin slides. Histological and molecular techniques were used to identify patterns and differences in osteoclast behavior on each substrate.
resultsOsteoclasts cultured on glass slides possessed the greatest number of nuclei and the highest expression levels of ACP5 (TRAP) and CTSK, with osteoclasts on bone and dentin slides displaying progressively lower levels. Src expression was also most pronounced in osteoclasts on glass slides, with decreased levels observed on bone and dentin. This variation in Src expression likely contributed to differences in cytoskeletal remodeling and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), resulting in substrate-dependent divergences in osteoclastogenesis.
conclusionsGlass slides were the most favorable substrate for inducing osteoclastogenesis, while bone and dentin slides were less effective. The substrate-induced expression of Src played a fundamental role in shaping the phenotypic divergence of osteoclasts. These insights fill important knowledge gaps and have significant implications for the development and selection of in vitro models for bone-related diseases and drug screening platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.