ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Moving forward in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Screening.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic value of lung ultrasound in interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis: Correlation with HRCT and differentiation of ILD subtypes.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2026Article
- Identification of common genes and biomarkers between Dermatomyositis and rheumatoid arthritis through integrated bioinformatics.PloS one · 2026Article
- Proteomic analysis identifies novel molecular signatures and immune-metabolic pathways in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: clinical predictive model and external validation.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Rheumatoid Lung Disease.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025Review
- A Practical Multidisciplinary Approach to Identifying Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Clinician's Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of developing interstitial lung disease compared to the general population, a complication that is associated with significant morbidity and high mortality. Given its frequency and severity, ILD should always be considered during both the initial assessment and follow-up of RA patients. However, there is currently no consensus on which RA patients should be screened for ILD. In recent years, several scientific societies have developed specific screening proposals. According to the recommendations of the Spanish, American, and Austrian rheumatology societies, it is not necessary to screen all individuals with RA, and it should be tailored to each patient based on clinical risk factors. In contrast, the Portuguese Societies of Rheumatology and Pulmonology advocate for systematic screening of all RA patients. Risk factors for the development of ILD in RA patients are well identified, and several screening tools for RA-ILD based on these risk factors have been developed. However, all of these tools still require further validation. To address this issue, the ANCHOR-RA study, a multinational cross-sectional initiative, has been launched to develop a multivariable model for predicting RA-ILD, which could provide valuable guidance for screening practices in clinical settings. In addition to certain biochemical and genetic predictive markers, lung ultrasound appears to be a useful screening tool. When combined with clinical evaluation and risk factor assessment, it can help identify which patients require a thoracic HRCT evaluation, which remains the gold standard for confirming an ILD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.