ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Factors Influencing the Participation of Shared Decision Making in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patient: Protocol of a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe "paternalistic decision-making model" is no longer well suited to the modern clinical environment, and therefore, shared decision making (SDM) has emerged as a key approach. Although the benefits of SDM have been largely reported, several studies have reported low participation in SDM in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) model is one of the most frequently employed theoretical frameworks for predicting human behaviors. According to the TPB, intention is influenced by attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control, while behavior is influenced by both intention and perceived behavioral control. Therefore, we propose a mixed methods study based on TPB to investigate the status of Chinese stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) patients' participation in SDM, understand their experiences of SDM, and explore the factors that influence their participation in SDM. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed methods design will be used to explore the study aims, including a quantitative phase, a subsequent qualitative phase, and the final integration study. The quantitative study will use convenient sampling from the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University to conduct a cross-sectional survey (n ≥ 252). The qualitative study will be sampled using the maximum difference sampling method from the quantitative study results, and then the data will be collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 10-20). This study will use descriptive statistics and test hypotheses while considering a DISCUSSIONS: The study employs a mixed method approach with an explanatory sequential design, incorporating qualitative and quantitative methods to comprehensively understand the factors influencing SCAD patients' participation in SDM. Furthermore, these findings can inform the design of future intervention studies and provide healthcare providers with targeted information and communication to help SCAD patients make the most appropriate decisions. Study participants will be recruited using convenience sampling from just one single clinical setting, which may limit the findings' generalizability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University (Approval No.: 2024013). All the participants will sign an informed consent form before participating in the survey. The corresponding results and conclusions will be disseminated in journals and conferences after the completion of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.