ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Reliability of AlphaFold2 Models in Virtual Drug Screening: A Focus on Selected Class A GPCRs.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Fraxetin Inhibits UGT1A1 and UGT1A9 Activities In Vitro: Inhibition Kinetics, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Prediction of Herb-Drug Interaction Risk.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inhibiting NHEJ: In-Silico Approach to Stratifying DNA-PK Inhibitors, Predicting Radio-Halogenation Potential of DNA-PK Inhibitors, and Assessing AlphaFold2 Prediction Accuracy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development: Raising Quality per Decision.Pharmacopsychiatry · 2026Review
- The transformative impact of AI-enabled AlphaFold 3: evolution, current status, and future prospects in structural biology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- An integrative omics-guided druggability analysis of VCX2 in hepatocellular carcinoma using Peruvian natural products.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- DNA methylation regulates TREM1 expression to modulate immune responses and drive progression in colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm as a potential therapeutic target.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Investigations on genomic, topological and structural properties of diguanylate cyclases involved inCurrent research in structural biology · 2025Article
- Molecular Modelling in Bioactive Peptide Discovery and Characterisation.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Comprehensive biochemical, molecular and structural characterization of subtilisin with fibrinolytic potential in bioprocessing.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Article
- Deep learning in GPCR drug discovery: benchmarking the path to accurate peptide binding.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Molecular Evolution of theMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Orphan GPCRs in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Integrating Structural Biology and Drug Discovery Approaches.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein three-dimensional (3D) structure prediction is one of the most challenging issues in the field of computational biochemistry, which has overwhelmed scientists for almost half a century. A significant breakthrough in structural biology has been established by developing the artificial intelligence (AI) system AlphaFold2 (AF2). The AF2 system provides a state-of-the-art prediction of protein structures from nearly all known protein sequences with high accuracy. This study examined the reliability of AF2 models compared to the experimental structures in drug discovery, focusing on one of the most common protein drug-targeted classes known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) class A. A total of 32 representative protein targets were selected, including experimental structures of X-ray crystallographic and Cryo-EM structures and their corresponding AF2 models. The quality of AF2 models was assessed using different structure validation tools, including the pLDDT score, RMSD value, MolProbity score, percentage of Ramachandran favored, QMEAN Z-score, and QMEANDisCo Global. The molecular docking was performed using the Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking (GOLD) software. The AF2 models' reliability in virtual drug screening was determined by their ability to predict the ligand binding poses closest to the native binding pose by assessing the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) metric and docking scoring function. The quality of the docking and scoring function was evaluated using the enrichment factor (EF). Furthermore, the capability of using AF2 models in molecular docking to identify hits with key protein-ligand interactions was analyzed. The posing power results showed that the AF2 models successfully predicted ligand binding poses (RMSD < 2 Å). However, they exhibited lower screening power, with average EF values of 2.24, 2.42, and 1.82 for X-ray, Cryo-EM, and AF2 structures, respectively. Moreover, our study revealed that molecular docking using AF2 models can identify competitive inhibitors. In conclusion, this study found that AF2 models provided docking results comparable to experimental structures, particularly for certain GPCR targets, and could potentially significantly impact drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.