ArticleMicromachines2024
Quantitative Optimization of Handheld Probe External Pressure on Dermatological Microvasculature Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Angiography.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and quantification of oral lymphatic vessel networks using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) Captures Early Micro-Vascular Remodeling in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer During Superficial Radiotherapy: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)-based angiography (OCTA) is a high-resolution, high-speed, and non-invasive imaging method that can provide vascular mapping of subcutaneous tissue up to approximately 2 mm. In dermatology applications of OCTA, handheld probes are always designed with a piece of transparent but solid contact window placed at the end of the probe to directly contact the skin for achieving better focusing between the light source and the tissue, reducing noise caused by minor movements. The pressure between the contact window and the skin is usually uncontrollable, and high external pressure affects the quality of microvascular imaging by compressing the vessels and obstructing the underlying blood flow. Therefore, it is necessary to determine a pressure range to ensure that the vessels can be fully imaged in high-quality images. In this paper, two pressure sensors were added to the existing handheld OCT probe, and the imaging probe was fixed to a metal stand and adjusted vertically to change the pressure between the probe and the tested skin site, a gradient of roughly 4 kPa (with 1-2 kPa error) increase was applied in each experiment, and the impact of pressure to the vessel was calculated. The experiment involved a total of five subjects, three areas of which were scanned (palm, back of the hand, and forearm). The vessel density was calculated to evaluate the impact of external pressure on angiography. In addition, PSNR was calculated to ensure that the quality of different tests was at a similar level. The angiography showed the highest density (about 10%) when the pressure between the contact window on the probe and the test area was between 3 and 5 kPa. As the pressure increased, the vascular density decreased, and the rate of decrease varied in different test areas. After fitting all the data points according to the different sites, the slope of the fitted line, i.e., the rate of decrease in density per unit value of pressure, was found to be 4.05% at the palm site, 6.93% at the back of the hand, and 4.55% at the forearm site. This experiment demonstrates that the pressure between the skin and contact window is a significant parameter that cannot be ignored. It is recommended that in future OCTA data collection processes and probe designs, the impact of pressure on the experiment be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.