ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Postmenopausal Women Medications on SARS-CoV-2 Infection Progression.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been evident that women and young people were less susceptible to severe infections compared to males. In a previous study, we observed a reduced prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in hormonal-driven breast cancer patients undergoing SERM (selective estrogen receptor modulator) therapy with respect to other treatments inhibiting estrogen synthesis. In addition to being used in anticancer therapy, SERMs are also prescribed for postmenopausal osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Therefore, in this study, a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infections in a population of women over 50 years who were treated for the management of menopausal symptoms was performed. SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalizations, and death rates were evaluated in women residing in the Italian north-eastern Veneto Region who were undergoing treatment with Estrogen Modulators (EMs); Estrogen or Progestin, and their combination (EPs); Bisphosphonates (BIs); or cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) ± calcium supplementation (CC). The final cohort study included 124,393 women, of whom 6412 were found to be SARS-CoV-2 infected (CoV2+ve). The results indicated that only women treated with vitamin D3 alone or in combination with calcium showed a significant reduction in their SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by 26% (OR 0.74; 95%CI 0.60-0.91). On the other hand, an increased risk of hospitalization (OR 2.69; 95%CI 1.77-4.07) was shown for the same treatments. The results highlighted in this work contribute to shedding some light on the widely debated role of vitamin D in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the disease's treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.