ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024
Endochondral Ossification for Spinal Fusion: A Novel Perspective from Biological Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis and osteoporosis therapies as determinants of implant fixation failure in arthroplasty and spinal fusion constructs: a position statement from the Fracture Working Group of the Council of Scientific Advisors of the International Osteoporosis Foundation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Degenerative scoliosis (DS), encompassing conditions like spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis, is a common type of spinal deformity. Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) stands as a conventional surgical intervention for this ailment, aiming at decompression, restoration of intervertebral height, and stabilization of motion segments. Despite its widespread use, the precise mechanism underlying spinal fusion remains elusive. In this review, our focus lies on endochondral ossification for spinal fusion, a process involving vertebral development and bone healing. Endochondral ossification is the key step for the successful vertebral fusion. Endochondral ossification can persist in hypoxic conditions and promote the parallel development of angiogenesis and osteogenesis, which corresponds to the fusion process of new bone formation in the hypoxic region between the vertebrae. The ideal material for interbody fusion cages should have the following characteristics: (1) Good biocompatibility; (2) Stable chemical properties; (3) Biomechanical properties similar to bone tissue; (4) Promotion of bone fusion; (5) Favorable for imaging observation; (6) Biodegradability. Utilizing cartilage-derived bone-like constructs holds promise in promoting bony fusion post-operation, thus warranting exploration in the context of spinal fusion procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.