Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39338461›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

Impact of

Juan Castillo Zuniga, Anlly M Fresno Rueda, Ryan S Samuel, Benoit St-Pierre, Crystal L Levesque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sheep-DerivedMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan Castillo ZunigaAnimal Science Complex, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, P.O. Box 2170, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Anlly M Fresno RuedaAnimal Science Complex, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, P.O. Box 2170, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Ryan S SamuelAnimal Science Complex, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, P.O. Box 2170, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2257-8762
Benoit St-PierreAnimal Science Complex, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, P.O. Box 2170, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9752-7463
Crystal L LevesqueAnimal Science Complex, Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, P.O. Box 2170, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2978-5852

Funding

SDSU Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch funds, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture SD00H666-18, SD00H682-19, and SD00H719-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weaning is a critical stage in the swine production cycle, as young pigs need to adjust to sudden and dramatic changes in their diet and environment. Among the various organ systems affected, the gastrointestinal tract is one of the more severely impacted during this transition. Traditionally, challenges at weaning have been managed by prophylactic use of antibiotics, which not only provides protection against diarrhea and other gut dysfunction but also has growth-promoting effects. With banning or major restrictions on the use of antibiotics for this purpose, various alternative products have been developed as potential replacements, including direct-fed microbials (DFMs) such as probiotics and postbiotics. As their efficiency needs to be improved, a continued effort to gain a deeper understanding of their mechanism of action is necessary. In this context, this report presents a study on the impact of a

Indexed as

bacteriaintestinal morphologymicrobiotaswineweaning

Identifiers

PMID39338461
PMCPMC11433873

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.