ArticleMicroorganisms2024
Clinical Applicability of Microbiota Sampling in a Subfertile Population: Urine versus Vagina.
Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The interplay of microbiome, molecular mechanisms, and fertility -an integrated review.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The urogenital microbiota is increasingly gaining recognition as a significant contributor to reproductive health. Recent studies suggest that microbiota can serve as predictors for fertility treatment outcomes. Our objective was to investigate the degree of similarity in microbial composition between patient-collected urine and vaginal samples in a subfertile population. We enrolled women of reproductive age (20-44 years) diagnosed with subfertility and requiring in vitro fertilization (IVF) or IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment. They self-collected both mid-stream urine samples and vaginal swabs before commencing the IVF or IVF-ICSI procedure. All samples were analysed using the intergenic spacer profiling (IS-pro) technique, a rapid clinical microbiota analysis tool. The main outcome measures were the degree of similarity of microbial composition between the two different, but simultaneously collected, samples. Our findings revealed a high correlation (R squared of 0.78) in microbiota profiles between paired urine and vaginal samples from individual patients. Nevertheless, the urinary microbiota profiles contained fewer species compared to the vaginal microbiota, resulting in minor but distinguishable differences. Furthermore, different subfertility diagnoses appeared to be associated with differences in microbial profiles. A noteworthy observation was the exclusive presence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.