ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
CHNSO Elemental Analyses of Volatile Organic Liquids by Combined GC/MS and GC/Flame Ionisation Detection Techniques with Application to Hydrocarbon-Rich Biofuels.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elemental analysis is a fundamental method for determining the carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur, and oxygen (CHNSO) contents in organic materials. Automated conventional elemental analysers are commonly used for CHNSO determinations, but they face challenges when analysing volatile organic liquids due to sample losses. This present study explores the combination of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and gas chromatography-flame ionisation detection (GC/FID) as a more accurate alternative method for elemental analysis of such liquids. Six different liquid samples containing various organic compounds have been analysed using both a conventional elemental analyser (Method 1) and the combined GC/MS-GC/FID method (Method 2). The results showed that Method 1 gave results with significant errors for carbon (by more than ±10 wt%) and oxygen (by up to ±30 wt%) contents due to volatile losses leading to inaccurate "oxygen-by-difference" determinations. In contrast, Method 2 gave more accurate and consistently representative elemental data in a set of simulated samples when compared to theoretical elemental data. This work proposes the use of the GC/FID method as a reliable alternative for CHNSO analysis of volatile organic liquids and suggests that employing the GC/FID technique can mitigate the common errors associated with conventional CHNSO analysis of such samples. However, successfully using Method 2 would depend on the skills and experience of users in qualitative and quantitative organic chemical analyses by gas chromatography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.