Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39339695›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Evaluation of Polyphenol Intake in Pregnant Women from South-Eastern Spain and the Effect on Anthropometric Measures at Birth and Gestational Age.

Daniel Hinojosa-Nogueira, Desirée Romero-Molina, Beatriz González-Alzaga, María José Giménez-Asensio, Antonio F Hernandez, Beatriz Navajas-Porras, Adriana Delgado-Osorio, Antonio Gomez-Martin, Sergio Pérez-Burillo, Silvia Pastoriza de la Cueva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel Hinojosa-NogueiraBiomedical Research Center, Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3303
Desirée Romero-MolinaBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-5401
Beatriz González-AlzagaBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.
María José Giménez-AsensioBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Antonio F HernandezBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-5418
Beatriz Navajas-PorrasBiomedical Research Center, Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-5434
Adriana Delgado-OsorioBiomedical Research Center, Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-0085
Antonio Gomez-MartinBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6537-1468
Sergio Pérez-BurilloDepartment of Pharmacology and Pediatrics, University of Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6398-7496
Silvia Pastoriza de la CuevaBiomedical Research Center, Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Marina LacasañaBiosanitary Research Institute ibs.GRANADA, 18014 Granada, Spain.
José Ángel Rufián-HenaresBiomedical Research Center, Department of Nutrition and Bromatology, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-4353

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01559),Regional Health Council of Andalusia (PI-045-2014)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During pregnancy, controlling nutrition is crucial for the health of both mother and foetus. While polyphenols have positive health effects, some studies show harmful outcomes during pregnancy. This study evaluated polyphenol intake in a cohort of mother-child pairs and examined its effects on foetal anthropometric parameters. Polyphenol intake was assessed using food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 24-h dietary recalls, and analysed with the Phenol-Explorer database. Gestational age and birth measurements were retrieved from medical records. Statistical analyses validated dietary records and assessed polyphenol impact using multivariate generalised linear models. The study found that mean gestational age was 39.6 weeks, with a mean birth weight of 3.33 kg. Mean total polyphenol intake by FFQ was 2231 mg/day, slightly higher than 24-h recall data. Flavonoids and phenolic acids constituted 52% and 37% of intake, respectively, with fruits and legumes as primary sources. This study highlights the use of FFQs to estimate polyphenol intake. Furthermore, the study found associations between polyphenol consumption and anthropometric parameters at birth, with the effects varying depending on the type of polyphenol. However, a more precise evaluation of individual polyphenol intake is necessary to determine whether the effects they produce during pregnancy may be harmful or beneficial for foetal growth.

Indexed as

AnthropometryBirth WeightGestational AgePolyphenolsAdultDietDiet RecordsDiet SurveysFemaleFetal DevelopmentFlavonoidsFruitHumansHydroxybenzoatesInfant, NewbornMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFlavonoidsHydroxybenzoatesphenolic acidPolyphenols24-h dietary recallsfoetal anthropometryfood frequency questionnairepolyphenolspregnant women

Identifiers

PMID39339695
PMCPMC11435302

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.