Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340059›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Chagas Disease Diagnosis with

Andressa da M Durans, Paloma Napoleão-Pêgo, Flavia C G Reis, Evandro R Dias, Luciana E S F Machado, Guilherme C Lechuga, Angela C V Junqueira, Salvatore G De-Simone, David W Provance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andressa da M DuransCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-5813
Paloma Napoleão-PêgoCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Flavia C G ReisCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Evandro R DiasCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-9778
Luciana E S F MachadoCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Guilherme C LechugaCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-3802
Angela C V JunqueiraLaboratory on Parasitic Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.
Salvatore G De-SimoneCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-656X
David W ProvanceCenter for Technological Development in Health, National Institute of Science and Technology for Innovation in Neglected Population Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-0672

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 200.960/2022Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (#SEI26003/01279/2021Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Inova VPPIS-004-FIO-18-52National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 305157-2020-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serological tests are critical tools in the fight against infectious disease. They detect antibodies produced during an adaptive immune response against a pathogen with an immunological reagent, whose antibody binding characteristics define the specificity and sensitivity of the assay. While pathogen proteins have conveniently served as reagents, their performance is limited by the natural grouping of specific and non-specific antibody binding sites, epitopes. An attractive solution is to build synthetic proteins that only contains pathogen-specific epitopes, which could theoretically reach 100% specificity. However, the genesis of de novo proteins remains a challenge. To address the uncertainty of producing a synthetic protein, we have repurposed the beta barrel of fluorescent proteins into a receptacle that can receive several epitope sequences without compromising its ability to be expressed. Here, two versions of a multiepitope protein were built using the receptacle that differ by their grouping of epitopes specific to the parasite

Indexed as

Chagas diseaseELISAGreen Fluorescent ProteinSerodiagnosisTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID39340059
PMCPMC11435546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.