ArticleJACC. Clinical electrophysiology2024
Enhanced Ca
Article in JACC. Clinical electrophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Renal denervation in experimental autoimmune myocarditis: association with cardiac function and changes in calcium and MAPK/ERK signaling.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter Burden in the United States and the European Union: A Comparison and Assessment of Trends and Risk Factors.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Beat-to-beat variability of ventricular repolarization reveals sex-specific instability and proarrhythmic risk.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Cytosolic calcium handling signature: integration with clinical predictors enhances prediction of post-operative atrial fibrillation.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Predicting Sex-Specific Antiarrhythmic Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation through a Regression-Guided Computational Modeling Pipeline.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hormonal Atrial Fibrillation: Pathophysiological Mechanisms That Trigger and Sustain the Arrhythmic Circuits.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Mechanistic insights into sex differences in atrial electrophysiology and arrhythmia vulnerability through sex-specific computational models.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Developing cardiac biomechanical models beyond the clinic: modeling stressors of daily life.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Review
- Digital twin for sex-specific identification of class III antiarrhythmic drugs based on in vitro measurements, computer models, and machine learning tools.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSubstantial sex-based differences have been reported in atrial fibrillation (AF), but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.
objectivesThis study sought to gain a mechanistic understanding of Ca
methodsWe integrated reported sex differences and AF-associated changes (ie, expression and phosphorylation of Ca
resultsSimulated quiescent cardiomyocytes showed increased incidence of Ca
conclusionsSex-specific modeling uncovers increased Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.