ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2024
Construction of machine learning diagnostic models for cardiovascular pan-disease based on blood routine and biochemical detection data.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning model for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: model development and validation study.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Analysis of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Risk Factors and Prognosis Among Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Coronary Artery Calcification: Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model for identifying liver injury in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Automatic segmentation-based radiomics and deep learning combined with clinical parameters for precise differentiation of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas and metastases.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning-driven identification of heart failure biomarkers: a multi-model feature selection approach with SHAP-based interpretability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metabolomic Atlas of Cardiovascular Diseases: Mapping Shared and Specific Signatures.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Malnutrition Severity Drives Mortality in Geriatric Heart Failure: A Multicenter Extreme Gradient Boosting Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a cardiometabolic multimorbidity prediction model in middle-aged and older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Single-cell Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Diagnostic of T Cell-platelet Aggregates in Peripheral Blood for Coronary Vulnerable Plaques.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Machine learning and SHAP values for predicting coronary artery disease risk in Xinjiang, China.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Comparative study of 11 machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence risk after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation based on a real-world cohort: a retrospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Sex-specific machine learning models for carotid plaque prediction in individuals with fatty liver disease: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Falls Among Hospitalized Older Adults: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Comparative predictive performance of different eGFR equations for 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Medication Adherence Among Home-Dwelling Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Predicting cardiometabolic multimorbidity trajectory in middle-aged and older Chinese adults: insights from the cohort study on global ageing and adult health.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting medium-to-giant coronary aneurysms in Kawasaki disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A Multicohort Machine Learning Framework to Predict Mortality in Elderly Patients With Heart Disease: Insights From HARLS, SHARE, and HRS.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of coronary heart disease risk prediction based on simple physical examination parameters by machine learning model: a retrospective cohort model development and validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease, also known as circulation system disease, remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Traditional methods for diagnosing cardiovascular disease are often expensive and time-consuming. So the purpose of this study is to construct machine learning models for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases using easily accessible blood routine and biochemical detection data and explore the unique hematologic features of cardiovascular diseases, including some metabolic indicators.
methodsAfter the data preprocessing, 25,794 healthy people and 32,822 circulation system disease patients with the blood routine and biochemical detection data were utilized for our study. We selected logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural network to construct models. Finally, the SHAP algorithm was used to interpret models.
resultsThe circulation system disease prediction model constructed by XGBoost possessed the best performance (AUC: 0.9921 (0.9911-0.9930); Acc: 0.9618 (0.9588-0.9645); Sn: 0.9690 (0.9655-0.9723); Sp: 0.9526 (0.9477-0.9572); PPV: 0.9631 (0.9592-0.9668); NPV: 0.9600 (0.9556-0.9644); MCC: 0.9224 (0.9165-0.9279); F1 score: 0.9661 (0.9634-0.9686)). Most models of distinguishing various circulation system diseases also had good performance, the model performance of distinguishing dilated cardiomyopathy from other circulation system diseases was the best (AUC: 0.9267 (0.8663-0.9752)). The model interpretation by the SHAP algorithm indicated features from biochemical detection made major contributions to predicting circulation system disease, such as potassium (K), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), and indirect bilirubin (NBIL). But for models of distinguishing various circulation system diseases, we found that red blood cell count (RBC), K, direct bilirubin (DBIL), and glucose (GLU) were the top 4 features subdividing various circulation system diseases.
conclusionsThe present study constructed multiple models using 50 features from the blood routine and biochemical detection data for the diagnosis of various circulation system diseases. At the same time, the unique hematologic features of various circulation system diseases, including some metabolic-related indicators, were also explored. This cost-effective work will benefit more people and help diagnose and prevent circulation system diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.