ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Knowledge mapping of induced membrane technique: a scientometric study from 2004 to 2023.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in aseptic and infected long-bone defect management: Are there any differences?World journal of orthopedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe induced membrane technique (IMT) is a two-step procedure used for reconstructing segmental bone defects in the limbs. The osteogenic mechanism after bone grafting using IMT remains unclear, and efforts to modify the original techniques are limited to the investigative phase. Therefore, reviewing existing knowledge and identifying hotspots and new trends in IMT is critical.
methodsWe retrieved reviews and articles associated with IMT published between 2004 and 2023 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The keywords included induced membrane technique, guided bone regeneration, bone defect reconstruction, bone graft, stem cells, Masquelet technique, management of bone defects, and scaffold. HistCite, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R-bibliometrics were used for scientometric analysis.
resultsA total of 1019 publications from 374 academic journals with 33,995 co-cited references by 2,331 institutions from 65 countries or regions were included. China (n = 235) and the United States (n = 215) were the most productive countries, with Shanghai Jiao Tong University producing the most number of publications (n = 18). Journal Injury [co-citations = 1774; impact factor (IF) 2022 = 2.5] published the most manuscripts, while Masquelet AC and Giannoudis PV published literature with a significant influence on IMT, showing more co-citations (n = 727; n = 355). Two preface hotspots of IMT focused on investigating the microscopic mechanism (such as the membrane supporting graft-to-bone union and the role of inflammatory cells) and developing new techniques to improve IMT (such as bone tissue engineering and new drugs).
conclusionThis study comprehensively reviewed the literature about IMT published in the last 20 years using qualitative and quantitative methods, providing valuable information for researchers investigating IMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.