Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342524›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2025

Effect of intravenous different drugs on the prevention of restlessness during recovery period of pediatric laparoscopic surgery: a randomized control trial.

Zhi-Jie Liang, Jia-Mei Liang, Xiao-Ling Nong, Ni-Qiao Chen, An-Yuan Liu, Xiao-Qiang Sun, Yi-Xing Lu, Zhuo-Xin Ou, Sheng-Lan Li, Yu-Nan Lin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhi-Jie Liang *Department of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Jia-Mei Liang *Department of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Xiao-Ling NongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Ni-Qiao ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
An-Yuan LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Xiao-Qiang SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yi-Xing LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Maternity and Child Health Care of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.
Zhuo-Xin OuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Sheng-Lan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China.
Yu-Nan LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, NO.6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, China. 277464077@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explored the impact of dexmedetomidine and esketamine in mitigating restlessness during the postoperative recovery phase following laparoscopic surgery in children.

methods102 individuals aged 1 to 7 years experiencing laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated into three groups, each accepting 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine, or saline immediately at the end of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Emergence agitation (EA) occurrence was assessed by PAED scale and 5-point agitation scale. Pain was judged using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale. The recovery time, extubation time, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay time were recorded for all three groups.

resultsPatients administered 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (8.8%) and individuals given 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine (11.8%) showed lower incidences of emergence agitation compared to those receiving saline (35.5%; P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to discharge from the PACU among the three groups of patients (P > 0.05). The recovery time and extubation time were notably extended in the dexmedetomidine group (40.88 ± 12.95 min, 42.50 ± 13.38 min) when compared to the saline group (32.56 ± 13.05 min, 33.29 ± 11.30 min; P = 0.009, P = 0.010).

conclusionFollowing CO

Indexed as

Anesthesia Recovery PeriodDexmedetomidineEmergence DeliriumHypnotics and SedativesKetamineLaparoscopyChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineDexmedetomidineEmergence agitationEsketamineLaparoscopic surgery in children

Identifiers

PMID39342524
PMCPMC11782418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.