ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Exploring a new signature for lung adenocarcinoma: analyzing cuproptosis-related genes through Integrated single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuproptosis-associated PDHA1 promotes sarcoma progression and immunotherapy responsiveness via the E2F1-PD-L1 axis: a multi-omics and clinical validation study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Identification of prognostic genes associated with phase separation in lung adenocarcinoma and construction of prognostic models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive bioinformatics and immunohistochemical analyses identify phosphoinositide metabolism and PNPLA7 as potential biomarkers in urological cancers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis of gene expression and the immune landscape in gastric cancer through single-cell and multi-omics approaches.Discover oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) continues to pose a significant global health challenge. This research investigates cuproptosis and its association with LUAD progression. Employing various bioinformatics techniques, the study explores the heterogeneity of LUAD cells, identifies prognostic cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs), examines cell-to-cell communication networks, and assesses their functional roles.
methodsWe downloaded single-cell RNA sequencing data from TISCH2 and bulk RNA sequencing data from TCGA for exploring LUAD cell heterogeneity. Subsequently, "CellChat" package was employed for intercellular communication network analysis, while weighted correlation network analysis was applied for identification of hub CRGs. Further, A cuproptosis related prognostic signature was constructed via LASSO regression, validated through survival analysis, nomogram development, and ROC curves. We assessed immune infiltration, gene mutations, and GSEA of prognostic CRGs. Finally, in vitro experiments were applied to validate CDC25C's role in LUAD.
resultsWe identified 15 clusters and nine cell type in LUAD. Malignant cells showed active communication and pathway enrichment in "oxidative phosphorylation" and "glycolysis". Meanwhile, prognostic hub CRGs including PFKP, CDC25C, F12, SIGLEC6, and NLRP7 were identified, with a robust prognostic signature. Immune infiltration, gene mutations, and functional enrichment correlated with prognostic CRGs. In vitro cell experiments have shown that CDC25C-deficient LUAD cell lines exhibited reduced activity.
conclusionThis research reveals the heterogeneity of LUAD cells, identifies key prognostic CRGs, and maps intercellular communication networks, providing insights into LUAD pathogenesis. These findings pave the way for developing targeted therapies and precision medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.