Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39344091›Full record

SynthesisJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2024

Molecular Insights into the Aroma Difference between Beer and Wine: A Meta-Analysis-Based Sensory Study Using Concentration Leveling Tests.

Xingjie Wang, Stephanie Frank, Martin Steinhaus

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xingjie WangTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences,Department of Chemistry, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8185-2739
Stephanie FrankLeibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich (Leibniz-LSB@TUM), Lise-Meitner-Straße 34, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5853-4839
Martin SteinhausTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences,Department of Chemistry, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85748 Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9879-1474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beer and wine are popular beverages with clearly different aroma characters, the molecular background of which has not yet been systematically investigated. A comprehensive literature survey returned 14 845 concentration values obtained from 160 beer and 904 wine samples, covering 42 basic beer and 42 basic wine odorants, among which 40 were common to both beverages. Based on mean concentrations and a comparison with threshold data, 29 beer and 32 wine odorants were finally selected to build aroma base models that reflected the basic olfactory difference between beer and wine. Orthonasal concentration leveling tests applied to groups of odorants with similar odor characteristics finally revealed the crucial role of fruity smelling compounds. When 11 fruity compounds, predominantly esters, in the beer aroma base model were adjusted to the respective concentration levels in the wine aroma base model, the sensory panel no longer described the sample as beer-like but as wine-like.

Indexed as

BeerOdorantsSmellWineHumansVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compoundsaroma basebeerconcentration leveling testfruity odorantsliterature surveymeta-analysiswine

Identifiers

PMID39344091
PMCPMC11468751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.