ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Circulating Plasma Proteins in Aortic Stenosis: Associations With Severity, Myocardial Response, and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics, clinical outcomes and molecular mechanisms associated with severe diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Article
- Targeted proteomics reveals immune protein patterns in serum from patients with calcific aortic stenosis.iScience · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEchocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis may not comprehensively reflect disease morbidity. Plasma proteomic profiling may add prognostic value in these patients. METHODS AND
resultsProximity extension assays (Olink) of 183 circulating cardiovascular and inflammatory proteins were performed in a prospective follow-up study of 122 asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patients (mean±SD age, 69.1±10.9 years; 61% men) with moderate to severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Protein signatures of higher-risk echocardiographic subgroups were determined. Associations of proteins with the primary composite outcome (heart failure hospitalization, progression to New York Heart Association class III-IV, or all-cause mortality) were evaluated using competing risk analyses, with aortic valve replacement being the competing risk. Network analysis unveiled mutually exclusive communities of proteins and echocardiographic parameters, connected only through NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF1A, TNFRSF1B, and TNFRSF14), and trefoil factor-3 were major hub proteins among the circulating biomarkers. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain >-15% was associated with higher levels of proteins, primarily of inflammation and immune regulation, whereas aortic valve area <1 cm
conclusionsPlasma proteins involved in inflammation and immune regulation were differentially expressed in patients with aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular global longitudinal strain, and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Their incorporation into aortic stenosis risk stratification warrants further assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.