ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2024
Reproducible supervised learning-assisted classification of spontaneous synaptic waveforms with Eventer.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coadministration of scopolamine and mGlu2 NAM VU6001966 as a novel antidepressant approach: Lowering effective dose and reducing cognitive side effects.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Absence of sex differences in serotonergic control of orbitofrontal cortex neuronal activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Activation of 5-HTPharmacological reports : PR · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection and analysis of spontaneous synaptic events is an extremely common task in many neuroscience research labs. Various algorithms and tools have been developed over the years to improve the sensitivity of detecting synaptic events. However, the final stages of most procedures for detecting synaptic events still involve the manual selection of candidate events. This step in the analysis is laborious and requires care and attention to maintain consistency of event selection across the whole dataset. Manual selection can introduce bias and subjective selection criteria that cannot be shared with other labs in reporting methods. To address this, we have created Eventer, a standalone application for the detection of spontaneous synaptic events acquired by electrophysiology or imaging. This open-source application uses the freely available MATLAB Runtime and is deployed on Mac, Windows, and Linux systems. The principle of the Eventer application is to learn the user's "expert" strategy for classifying a set of detected event candidates from a small subset of the data and then automatically apply the same criterion to the remaining dataset. Eventer first uses a suitable model template to pull out event candidates using fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based deconvolution with a low threshold. Random forests are then created and trained to associate various features of the events with manual labeling. The stored model file can be reloaded and used to analyse large datasets with greater consistency. The availability of the source code and its user interface provide a framework with the scope to further tune the existing Random Forest implementation, or add additional, artificial intelligence classification methods. The Eventer website (https://eventerneuro.netlify.app/) includes a repository where researchers can upload and share their machine learning model files and thereby provide greater opportunities for enhancing reproducibility when analyzing datasets of spontaneous synaptic activity. In summary, Eventer, and the associated repository, could allow researchers studying synaptic transmission to increase throughput of their data analysis and address the increasing concerns of reproducibility in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.