Evidence mapPaperPMID 39345490Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Validation of a refined protocol for mouse oral glucose tolerance testing without gavage.

Katherine R Pye, Louise Lantier, Julio E Ayala, Craig Beall, Kate L J Ellacott

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine R PyeDepartment of Clinical & Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0691-6007
Louise LantierVanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center-Live, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 815 Light Hall - 2215 Garland Ave, Nashville, TN37232-0615, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6620-4976
Julio E AyalaVanderbilt Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center-Live, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 815 Light Hall - 2215 Garland Ave, Nashville, TN37232-0615, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-2365
Craig BeallDepartment of Clinical & Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-0866
Kate L J EllacottDepartment of Clinical & Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5261-7465

Funding

Vanderbilt Diabetes Research CenterP30DK020593 · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · 2025 to 2025
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A glucose tolerance test (GTT) is routinely used to assess glucose homeostasis in clinical settings and in preclinical research studies using rodent models. The procedure assesses the ability of the body to clear glucose from the blood in a defined time after a bolus dose. In the human clinical setting, glucose is ingested via voluntary consumption of a glucose-sweetened drink. Typically, in the rodent GTT oral gavage (gavage-oGTT) or (more commonly) intraperitoneal injection (IPGTT) are used to administer the glucose bolus. Although used less frequently, likely due to investigator technical and experience barriers, the former is the more physiologically relevant as it integrates the gastrointestinal tract (GI), including release of key incretin hormones. However, orally gavaging glucose in the GTT is also not without its limitations: gavaging glucose straight into the stomach bypasses potentially critical early glucose-sensing via the mouth (cephalic phase) and associated physiological responses. Furthermore, gavaging is stressful on mice, and this by itself can increase blood glucose levels. We have developed and validated a refined protocol for mouse oral GTT which uses a voluntary oral glucose dosing method, micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA), without the need for water deprivation. This approach is simple and non-invasive. It is less stressful for the mice, as evidenced by lower circulating corticosterone levels 10 minutes after glucose-dosing compared to oral gavage. This is significant for animal and investigator welfare, and importantly minimising the confounding effect of stress on mouse glucose homeostasis. Using a randomised cross-over design, we have validated the MDA approach in the oGTT against oral gavage in male and female C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice. We show the ability of this method to detect changes in glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese animals. Compared to oral gavage there was lower inter-animal variation in the MDA-oGTT. In addition to being more representative of the human procedure, the MDA-oGTT is easy and has lower barriers to adoption than the gavage oGTT as it is non-invasive and requires no specialist equipment or operator training. The MDA-oGTT a more clinically representative, accessible, and refined replacement for the gavage-oGTT for mouse metabolic phenotyping, which is simple yet overcomes significant deficiencies in the current standard experimental approaches.

Identifiers

PMID39345490
PMCPMC11429937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.