ArticleCardiology research and practice2024
Effects of Cycloergometer on Cardiopulmonary Function in Elderly Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Trial.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite all the improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, this procedure is still associated with pulmonary and cardiovascular complications in the postoperative period, and early rehabilitation, done through the use of cycloergometer, can minimize such complications, besides reducing the length of hospital stay. Objective: Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the impact of cardiovascular exercise on lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and functional capacity in elderly patients after heart bypass surgery. Methods: To this purpose, a randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted. Research participants were randomized to the cycle ergometer group (CEG) or to the control group (CG). The CG was managed based on the institution's protocol. The CEG also carried out all the activities of the control group, but there was the inclusion of cycle ergometry through a device built by the researchers. Pulmonary function (vital capacity (VC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF)), ventilatory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)), and functional capacity (six-minute walk test) were evaluated before surgery, at ICU, and hospital discharge. Results: During the research period, 122 patients were evaluated, 61 in each group. The MIP of the cycle ergometry group was higher at discharge from the ICU 95% CI 8 (5.46 to 10.54) and at hospital discharge 95% CI 14 (16.89 to 11.11). MEP was higher in the cycle ergometry group at discharge from the ICU with 95% CI 6 (8.18 to 3.82) and at hospital discharge with 95% CI 9 (11.69 a 6.31). Vital capacity at ICU discharge with 95% CI 6 (7.98 to 4.02) and at hospital discharge with 95% CI 7 (8.98 to 5.02), as well as peak flow at ICU discharge with 95% CI 43 (75.27 to 10.73), showed relevance, being higher in the group that used the cycle ergometer. The CEG showed improvement in functional capacity at the time of hospital discharge with a 95% CI 56 (30.37 to 81.63). Conclusion: We conclude that application of cycloergometry after CABG decreases the loss of pulmonary function, muscle strength, and functional capacity. This trial is registered with RBR-39yrht6.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.