ArticleOphthalmology science
Diagnosing Glaucoma Based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Dataset Using Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer as a Large Language Model.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Professionals and Large Language Models: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Bibliographic Analysis.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- ChatGPT-Assisted Glaucoma Diagnosis: A Health-Equitable Multi-Ancestry Analysis Using Visual Field and Optical Coherence Tomography Data.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- How Far Have Large Language Models Advanced in Ophthalmology? A Systematic Review of Their Development, Evaluation, and Readiness for Clinical Use.Research square · 2026Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in Glaucoma: A Scoping Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Derived Biomechanical Index for Early Corneal Ectasia Detection: Advancing Beyond Tomography.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- GlaucoRAG: A Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for Expert-Level Glaucoma Assessment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Large Language Models: Pioneering New Educational Frontiers in Childhood Myopia.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- What will the future role for large language models (LLMs) be in managing patients with glaucoma?Expert review of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- AI in conjunctivitis research: assessing ChatGPT and DeepSeek for etiology, intervention, and citation integrity via hallucination rate analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the capabilities of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), as a large language model (LLM), for diagnosing glaucoma using the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) dataset, and comparing the diagnostic capability of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0. Design: Prospective data collection study. Participants: A total of 3170 eyes of 1585 subjects from the OHTS were included in this study. Methods: We selected demographic, clinical, ocular, visual field, optic nerve head photo, and history of disease parameters of each participant and developed case reports by converting tabular data into textual format based on information from both eyes of all subjects. We then developed a procedure using the application programming interface of ChatGPT, a LLM-based chatbot, to automatically input prompts into a chat box. This was followed by querying 2 different generations of ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4.0) regarding the underlying diagnosis of each subject. We then evaluated the output responses based on several objective metrics. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score. Results: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 achieved AUC of 0.74, accuracy of 66%, specificity of 64%, sensitivity of 85%, and F1 score of 0.72. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 4.0 obtained AUC of 0.76, accuracy of 87%, specificity of 90%, sensitivity of 61%, and F1 score of 0.92. Conclusions: The accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 in diagnosing glaucoma based on input data from OHTS was promising. The overall accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 was higher than ChatGPT 3.5. However, ChatGPT 3.5 was found to be more sensitive than ChatGPT 4.0. In its current forms, ChatGPT may serve as a useful tool in exploring disease status of ocular hypertensive eyes when specific data are available for analysis. In the future, leveraging LLMs with multimodal capabilities, allowing for integration of imaging and diagnostic testing as part of the analyses, could further enhance diagnostic capabilities and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.