Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39346574›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Diagnosing Glaucoma Based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Dataset Using Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer as a Large Language Model.

Hina Raja, Xiaoqin Huang, Mohammad Delsoz, Yeganeh Madadi, Asma Poursoroush, Asim Munawar, Malik Y Kahook, Siamak Yousefi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hina RajaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Xiaoqin HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Mohammad DelsozDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Yeganeh MadadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Asma PoursoroushDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis and University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Asim MunawarNeuro-Symbolic AI at IBM Research, New York, New York.
Malik Y KahookDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Siamak YousefiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Predicting the risk of glaucoma from structural, functional, and genetic factors using artificial intelligenceR01EY033005 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI YOUSEFI, SIAMAK · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the capabilities of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), as a large language model (LLM), for diagnosing glaucoma using the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) dataset, and comparing the diagnostic capability of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4.0. Design: Prospective data collection study. Participants: A total of 3170 eyes of 1585 subjects from the OHTS were included in this study. Methods: We selected demographic, clinical, ocular, visual field, optic nerve head photo, and history of disease parameters of each participant and developed case reports by converting tabular data into textual format based on information from both eyes of all subjects. We then developed a procedure using the application programming interface of ChatGPT, a LLM-based chatbot, to automatically input prompts into a chat box. This was followed by querying 2 different generations of ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4.0) regarding the underlying diagnosis of each subject. We then evaluated the output responses based on several objective metrics. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score. Results: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 achieved AUC of 0.74, accuracy of 66%, specificity of 64%, sensitivity of 85%, and F1 score of 0.72. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 4.0 obtained AUC of 0.76, accuracy of 87%, specificity of 90%, sensitivity of 61%, and F1 score of 0.92. Conclusions: The accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 in diagnosing glaucoma based on input data from OHTS was promising. The overall accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 was higher than ChatGPT 3.5. However, ChatGPT 3.5 was found to be more sensitive than ChatGPT 4.0. In its current forms, ChatGPT may serve as a useful tool in exploring disease status of ocular hypertensive eyes when specific data are available for analysis. In the future, leveraging LLMs with multimodal capabilities, allowing for integration of imaging and diagnostic testing as part of the analyses, could further enhance diagnostic capabilities and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

ChatGPTDiagnosisGlaucomaLarge language models

Identifiers

PMID39346574
PMCPMC11437927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.