ArticleVeterinary research communications2024
Comparative fluorophotometric evaluation of the ocular surface retention time of cross-linked and linear hyaluronic acid ocular eye drops on healthy dogs.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluate and compare the retention time on the canine ocular surface of crosslinked hyaluronic acid (X-HA), linear hyaluronic acid (L-HA) and saline solution using fluorescent compounds (fluorescein sodium salt, Alexa Fluor 488 cadaverine and Alexa Fluor 488 maleimide).
methods0.9% saline solution (SAL) was combined with fluorescein sodium salt. X-HA and L-HA were covalently modified using Alexa Fluor 488 reactive moieties. Eye drops were applied to 70 eyes of 35 dogs that were previously assessed and determined to have a normal ocular surface. Employing a blue light filter (450-490 nm), digital images were captured from instillation to 180 min. Images were analyzed to assess the percent of the total ocular area covered with green fluorescence at various time points.
resultsX-HA exhibited a dual phase behavior: A broad microgel coverage first, followed by accumulation in tear film meniscus and medial canthus in the second phase, remaining in contact with the ocular surface up to 180 min. Coverage with L-HA and SAL eye drops quickly migrated to the tear meniscus. No traces of the fluorescent compounds were observed by 45 min in eyes treated with SAL solution compound and, by 120 min, eyes treated with L-HA.
conclusionsX-HA exhibited a significantly increased ocular surface contact time with the ocular surface compared with L-HA and SAL. Not only could this indicate extended lubrication time but also supports the potential use of this compound as a method for topical sustained-release drug application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39347917What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.