SynthesisJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2024
Atypical fractures at non-classical sites associated with anti-resorptive therapy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies 2025 consensus on atypical femoral fractures in patients with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2025Review
- Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Atypical Femur Fractures: an Update.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
- NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Pyroptosis in Osteoporosis: Osteoimmune Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targeting.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Bisphosphonate beak without the bisphosphonate: atypical femoral fracture with denosumab.BMJ case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is common, affecting more than 20% of women and 6% of men globally over the age of 50. Anti-resorptive drugs, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have been effective treatments for osteoporosis for more than 30 years. Rare complications of anti-resorptive therapy include medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures (AFF). The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) proposed a case definition for these atypical femoral fractures in 2010, which was updated in 2013. However, atypical fractures at non-classical sites have been increasingly described. We aimed to systematically identify atypical fracture cases excluded from the ASBMR AFF case definition in patients receiving anti-resorptive medication for longer than 3 yr. A structured search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane, and Web of Sciences, and hand-searching of conference abstracts were undertaken. All full-text articles written in English describing an atypical fracture in patients (aged >18 yr) and receiving anti-resorptive medication for >3 yr were included, with data extracted and analyzed by two independent reviewers. Sixty-six articles were identified, describing 151 cases of atypical fractures in 114 individuals. The most frequent fracture site was the ulna, followed by the tibia. All patients were taking anti-resorptive treatment prior to or at the time of fracture, most frequently alendronate monotherapy (44%). Most commonly, fractures were transverse in nature (95%), following minimal or no trauma (96%), and non-comminuted (98%) with cortical thickening of the surrounding bone (69%). Anti-resorptive treatment was ceased following an atypical fracture in the majority (89%). Atypical fractures are rare and should not deter physicians from appropriate anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. However, clinicians should be alert to their presence at additional sites to the femur. An update of the current ASBMR AFF case definition to include other skeletal sites could be timely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.