ArticleJournal of sleep research2025
Associations of polysomnographic measures of obstructive sleep apnea, and nocturnal oxygen saturation with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged and older men.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Associations of polysomnographic measures of obstructive sleep apnea, and nocturnal oxygen saturation with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged and older men.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Assists in Revealing Associations Between Polysomnographic Biomarkers and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Men.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, few prospective epidemiological studies have accounted for important T2DM predictors including pre-diabetes status and testosterone. Participants in the longitudinal Men Androgens Inflammation Lifestyles Environment and Stress (MAILES) study, who underwent eight-channel home-based polysomnography (PSG) in 2010-2011 (n = 824) and were free of diabetes at baseline were included in the analysis (n = 682). From 2015 to 2021, 78.6% (n = 536) completed at least one follow-up assessment. Incident T2DM was determined by self-reported doctor diagnosis, diabetes medications, plasma glucose (fasting ≥7.0 mmol/L or random ≥11.0 mmol/L) or glycated haemoglobin ≥6.5%. Conservative hierarchical Poisson regression models adjusted associations of PSG metrics (categorical and continuous) for age, waist circumference, baseline fasting glucose and testosterone concentrations. In all, 52 men (9.7%) developed T2DM over a mean (range) of 8.3 (3.5-10.5) years. Significant age- and waist circumference-adjusted association of incident T2DM with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥20 events/h (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-2.8; p = 0.23] and highest quartile of delta index (IRR 2.1, 95% CI 0.95-4.6; p = 0.066) were attenuated after adjustment for baseline glucose and testosterone, and the association with the lowest quartile of mean oxygen saturation persisted (IRR 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-10.3; p = 0.029). Categorical measures of AHI severity, oxygen desaturation index, and hypoxia burden index (HBI) were not independently associated with incident T2DM. Associations with T2DM were similar when continuous PSG variables were used; however, HBI was significant (IRR 1.015, 95% CI 1.006-1.024; p = 0.007). In a sub-sample with OSA treatment data (n = 479), these significant associations persisted after excluding adequately treated OSA (n = 32). Understanding underlying OSA endotypes generating hypoxaemia may identify opportunities for diabetes prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.