ArticleCommunications biology2024
Crosslinking intensity modulates the reliability and sensitivity of chromatin conformation detection at different structural levels.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAD-C: An engineered nuclease enables repair-freebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Many roads lead to a plant cistrome: mapping and interpreting transcription factor binding in plants.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Optimized ChIP-exo for mammalian cells and patterned sequencing flow cells.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Stress-induced loss of CTCF reveals an alternative, promoter-based mode of cohesin looping.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Selective Sorting of Senescent Cell Subpopulations Compatible with Downstream Genomics Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Formaldehyde (FA) is a chemical that facilitates crosslinking between DNA and proteins. It is widely used in various biochemical assays, such as chromosome conformation capture (3C) and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP). While the concentration and temperature of FA treatment are recognized as crucial factors in crosslinking, their quantitative effects have largely remained unexplored. In this study, we employed 3C as a model system to systematically assess the impacts of these two factors on crosslinking. Our findings indicate that the strength of crosslinking significantly influences chromatin conformation detection at nearly all known structural levels. Specifically, a delicate balance between sensitivity and reliability is required when detecting higher-level structures, such as chromosome compartments. Conversely, intense crosslinking is preferred when targeting lower-level structures, such as topologically associated domains (TADs) or chromatin loops. Based on our data, we propose a conceptual molecular thermal motion model to elucidate the roles of these two factors in restricting FA crosslinking. Our results not only shed light on the previously overlooked confounding factor in FA crosslinking but also highlight the need for caution in new technology developments that rely on FA crosslinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.