Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39350148›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

What methods are currently available for incorporating implementation considerations within the economic evaluation of health technologies? A scoping review.

Robert Heggie, Kathleen Boyd, Hanin Kamaruzaman, Olivia Wu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert HeggieHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Rd, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK. Robert.Heggie@glasgow.ac.uk.
Kathleen BoydHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Rd, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
Hanin KamaruzamanHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Rd, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.
Olivia WuHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Rd, Glasgow, G12 8TB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen clinically effective, cost-effective health interventions are not fully implemented in clinical practice, population health suffers. Economic factors are among the most commonly cited reasons for suboptimal implementation. Despite this, implementation and economic evaluation are not routinely performed in conjunction with one another. This review sought to identify and describe what methods are available for researchers to incorporate implementation within economic evaluation, how these methods differ, when they should be used, and where gaps remain.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using systematic methods. A pearl-growing approach was used to identify studies. References and citations were identified using Web of Science and Scopus. We included for review any study that contained terms relating to economic evaluation and a series of implementation-related terms in the title or abstract. The search was conducted and validated using two independent researchers.

resultsOur review identified 42 unique studies that included a methodology for combining implementation and economic evaluation. The methods identified could be categorized into four broad themes: (i) policy cost-effectiveness approach (11 studies), (ii) value of information and value of implementation approach (16 studies), (iii) mixed methods approach (6 studies), and (iv) costing approach (9 studies). We identified a trend over time from methods that adopted the policy cost-effectiveness approach to methods that considered the trade-off between the value of information and value of implementation. More recently, mixed methods approaches to incorporate economic evaluation and implementation have been developed, alongside methods to define, measure and cost individual components of the implementation process for use in economic evaluation.

conclusionOur review identified a range of methods currently available for researchers considering implementation alongside economic evaluation. There is no single method or tool that can incorporate all the relevant issues to fully incorporate implementation within an economic evaluation. Instead, there are a suite of tools available, each of which can be used to answer a specific question relating to implementation. Researchers, reimbursement agencies and national and local decision-makers need to consider how best to utilize these tools to improve implementation.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth PolicyHumansResearch DesignTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalEconomic evaluationHealth technology assessmentImplementation

Identifiers

PMID39350148
PMCPMC11441006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.