ReviewCureus2024
Assessing Telehealth in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Challenges in Rural and Underserved Areas.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of and implementation requirements for telehealth in palliative care patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Nurse-led tele-palliative care for symptom management and family support: A hybrid umbrella review of reviews and primary studies.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping global inequities in telemedicine implementation: An umbrella review of barriers and facilitators.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Where the final day is spent: patterns in place of death among U.S. adults with alcoholic liver cirrhosis, 1999-2023.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Nurses' Perspectives on the Integration of Telehealth in Palliative Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Australian Pathways for Specialist Pain Management and Early Palliative Care for People With Pancreatic Cancer: Developed Using a Community Consensus Approach.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' experiences of telehealth adoption in palliative care: A cross-sectional survey.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Efficacy of telemedicine for cancer patients in outpatient palliative care setting: Protocol of a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- Transforming Palliative Care for Rural Patients with COPD Through Nurse-Led Models.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Post-Acute Transition to Home With Supportive Care (PATHS): A Novel Nurse Practitioner-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve End-of-Life Oncology Care.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Clinical Decision-Making: A Perspective on Advancing Personalized Precision Medicine for Elderly Diabetes Patients.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating Telehealth into Community-Based Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Bridging the digital readiness gap in palliative home care: A process to data approach.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of telehealth into palliative care has garnered significant attention due to its potential to enhance both access and quality of care, particularly for patients in rural and underserved areas. This interest stems from the need to address geographical and logistical barriers that traditionally hinder palliative care delivery. Despite its potential benefits, the effectiveness of telehealth and the challenges associated with its implementation remain underexplored, necessitating further investigation. This study aims to critically evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in palliative care by focusing on several key areas: its impact on access to care, symptom management, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. To achieve this, a systematic review was conducted, synthesizing data from various studies that investigated telehealth interventions within palliative care settings. The review employed a comprehensive search strategy across electronic databases, concentrating on randomized controlled trials (RTCs) published between 2014 and 2024. To ensure the reliability of the findings, low-quality and unrelated studies were excluded, and the remaining studies were meticulously analyzed for bias and methodological quality. The review's findings indicate that telehealth significantly enhances access to palliative care, allowing patients to receive timely and appropriate care without the need for extensive travel. It also improves symptom management and patient satisfaction, aligning to provide patient-centered care. Additionally, telehealth is cost-effective by reducing expenses associated with travel and in-person visits. These benefits highlight telehealth's potential to address some of the critical challenges in palliative care delivery. Despite its advantages, implementing telehealth in palliative care is not without challenges. Technological barriers, such as inadequate infrastructure and device limitations, pose significant hurdles. Integration issues, including the need for seamless incorporation into existing care systems, and varying levels of digital literacy among patients and caregivers, also impact the effectiveness of telehealth. Addressing these challenges is crucial for optimizing telehealth's implementation. Ensuring that telehealth solutions are accessible, user-friendly, and well-integrated into care practices is essential for fully leveraging its potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.